11 years after Super Bowl 49 between the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks, the two teams meet again in Super Bowl 60.
Of course, that first matchup infamously ended in a goal-line interception from Russell Wilson with under a minute left in the game. With the legendary Marshawn Lynch lined up behind Wilson, it was confusing as to why he didn't get the ball to pound it in.
Seahawks quarterback Sam Darnold enjoyed a terrific regular season in which he threw for over 4,000 yards and had 25 touchdowns, but he did struggle with turnovers.
His 14 interceptions were third-most in the NFL, and his 11 fumbles were the most.
History constantly repeats itself, especially in football, and fans are wondering: what are the chances Seattle throws another goal-line pick in Super Bowl LX?
bet365 has multiple goal-line situation markets for the Big Game, including an offering for Seattle to throw another pick near the endzone.
Backed by statistical data from the Elias Sports Bureau, let's take a look at the odds for the potential goal-line situations for Darnold and the Seahawks:
Seahawks to Throw an Interception from On or Inside the NE One Yard Line (+15000)
History Revisited - In Super Bowl XLIX, Seattle's one-yard pass was famously intercepted by Malcolm Butler, a moment etched into NFL lore. If the Seahawks trust the pass at the doorstep again, can New England's defense bait another throw and flip the game with a pick from a single yard out?
Seahawks to Attempt a Pass from the Patriots One Yard Line (+1000)
A Fateful Decision - If the Seahawks find themselves in a similar situation, will they opt for a pass again, or choose to run the ball this time?
Seahawks to Throw a TD Pass from On or Inside the Patriots One Yard Line (+1800)
A Chance for Redemption - With a chance to rewrite the narrative, with a potent passing game and a chance to make history, will Seattle choose to throw for a touchdown in a high-pressure situation?
Read more Elias Insights markets on site.
Read the latest Super Bowl news on site.
All odds written in this article were correct at the time of writing and are subject to change.
