SMU and Louisville meet Saturday afternoon in one of the most important early ACC games of the season.
The Mustangs enter unbeaten, while Louisville already took a narrow loss to Ole Miss and now gets a chance to steady its conference outlook at home.
Kickoff from L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium is scheduled for 3:30 PM ET on ESPN2.
The quarterback matchup is the headline. Kevin Jennings and Lincoln Kienholz have been among the most efficient passers in the country through two games, but this matchup may ultimately be decided by physicality, tackling and which offense can stay on schedule without giving the game away.
This is close enough that I am happy to lay the short number with Louisville at home.
Jennings has been excellent statistically. He leads the nation in yards per attempt and ranks third nationally in EPA per dropback, while Kienholz sits fourth in yards per attempt and 10th in EPA per dropback.
SMU has already shown it can move the ball at an elite level. The Mustangs piled up nearly 600 yards against Florida State, but ball security was a major problem.
That is dangerous in a road game where Louisville should be able to create pressure and force SMU to repeatedly execute in tight situations.
Jennings has been very effective in space, but he has not looked as comfortable when pressure gets home. Louisville does not necessarily need to send extra rushers all afternoon.
The Cardinals can play more coverage, deny explosives and trust their front to eventually affect him.
SMU's offensive line also looks stronger on the left side than the right, which gives Louisville a specific area to attack.
On the other side, I trust Louisville's balance more.
Jeff Brohm has built an offense that can win in several ways. Kienholz has thrown efficiently, but he is also a major part of the run game and that matters against an SMU defense that ranks 129th nationally in EPA per rush.
The Cardinals also rank sixth nationally in yards after catch, while SMU sits 18th. Tackling becomes critical.
Louisville has already been tested by Ole Miss, while SMU's best win came against Florida State. In a game this important, I trust Brohm's offensive design, Louisville's physicality and Kienholz's decision-making slightly more.
The Mustangs have won the last two meetings, but Louisville was badly depleted last season. This is a much different setup.
Neither offense relies heavily on pushing the ball deep. Both teams prefer quick throws, intermediate concepts and yards after catch.
That can create explosive plays, but it also means drives often require several successful snaps rather than one instant strike.
Both defenses have also been respectable at limiting explosives.
Ole Miss did hurt Louisville vertically, but SMU does not attack downfield in the same way. Jennings is much more comfortable working the short and intermediate areas, where Louisville can rally and tackle.
The bigger reason I like the Under is Louisville's rushing advantage.
SMU has struggled badly against the run and Brohm should lean into Kienholz and the rest of his backfield rather than turning this into a pure passing contest.
The recent scoring patterns also matter. Across SMU's last 12 games against FBS opponents, there has not been a truly high-scoring first half. Louisville has followed a similar pattern since the beginning of last season.
Both teams tend to feel out important games before opening things up.
There is also a broader clock-management angle here. In tight games under the current college football timing rules, sustained rushing drives can drain significant time.
With ACC positioning at stake, I expect both coaches to value possessions rather than play recklessly.
These two teams also commit enough penalties to kill promising drives.
The talent is absolutely there for points, but something in the 27-24 or 30-27 range feels more realistic.
This is my favorite player angle because Kienholz's rushing ability is paired with Louisville actively using him as a runner.
He has 20 carries for 111 yards and three touchdowns through two games, including 18 attempts for 69 yards against Ole Miss.
Louisville has the more dangerous ground game overall and forcing SMU to account for Kienholz should help create numbers advantages elsewhere.
Jennings is a good scrambler himself, but I trust Kienholz's designed rushing role more in this matchup.
At plus money, 40 yards is simply too low for a quarterback who has already shown Louisville is willing to give him double-digit carries in big games.
Read more college football picks and predictions on site.
SMU | +105 |
Louisville | -125 |
Spread | Louisville -1.5 |
Total Points | O/U 58.5 |
Read the latest college football news on site.
This article was written by a partner sports writer via Spotlight Sports Group. All odds displayed on this page were correct at the time of writing and are subject to withdrawal or change at any time.